Blog

Leadership Decisions Series #2

In the early stages of a business, decisions naturally sit with a small number of people: founders are close to the customers, they understand the finances, hold key relationships and carry much of the context behind why things are done a certain way. At this stage, centralised decision-making can be efficient.

But as the business grows, the number of people, activities and decisions grows with it. What once made the organisation fast can gradually start slowing it down, as more responsibility needs to move into the organisation. When leaders struggle to let go, we often hear that they need to trust their people more.

But the question actually is: is delegation about trust?

Trust matters: we are unlikely to hand significant responsibility to someone whose judgement or intentions we don't trust. But trust alone doesn't tell us what someone should own, whether they have the capability to own it, what authority comes with that responsibility or how much risk the organisation is prepared to accept.

Let's look at capability, it shapes what we can reasonably delegate. Someone can be committed, knowledgeable and trusted while still needing experience or support before taking on a particular responsibility. Yet there is a tension here too: if we wait until people are completely ready before giving them greater responsibility, how do they develop the capability to become ready?

Clarity matters as well:  what exactly are we delegating? What outcome is expected? Where does someone's responsibility begin and end? Which decisions can they make independently, which require consultation, and which still need approval?

Then there is context. In small businesses, a considerable amount of organisational knowledge can live in the heads of founders and early employees. We may delegate responsibility without realising how much information we use ourselves to make the same decisions. Without access to that context, someone else may reach a perfectly reasonable but very different conclusion.

Systems and processes also influence how far responsibility can travel. When ways of working are understood only through proximity, "ask this person, check with the founder, remember what happened last time", delegation remains dependent on individuals. As the organisation grows, clearer processes and accessible information make it possible for more decisions to happen without constantly travelling upwards.

And there is risk. Not every decision needs the same level of autonomy. Its financial, operational, reputational or people consequences may determine how much authority can reasonably be delegated. The objective is not necessarily to remove oversight, but to make deliberate choices about where it is needed.

Here’s the shift: delegation is not simply the transfer of work, it is the distribution of responsibility and decision-making capacity across the organisation.

That requires alignment between responsibility and authority. Asking managers to deliver outcomes while retaining every meaningful decision above them creates accountability without autonomy. Equally, transferring authority without the necessary capability, information or support can expose the business to unnecessary risk.

Leadership behaviour matters too. We can tell people that they have authority and still undermine it by repeatedly intervening, reversing their decisions or expecting them to reach exactly the conclusion we would have reached ourselves.

This is where trust becomes important again.

Delegation asks leaders to accept that someone else may approach a responsibility differently, while creating enough clarity, capability, context, authority and accountability for that difference to remain productive.

As a small business grows, the question may therefore evolve from "Who do I trust to do this?” to “What needs to be in place for this responsibility to sit successfully beyond me?”

Because eventually, the ability to delegate is not only a reflection of how much we trust our people, it is a reflection of how capable the organisation has become of operating beyond any one person.